KakarotHandtke, Egmont (2013): Settling the theory of saving.

PDF
MPRA_paper_44479.pdf Download (407kB)  Preview 
Abstract
There is no way around it: each theory rests on a tiny set of foundational propositions. Standard economics rests on behavioral axioms. After a long intellectual detour it should be clear by now that behavioral axioms are the wrong formal departure point. Being beyond repair, they have to be replaced by objective structural axioms. This paper deals with saving and its relation to investment and profit. It starts from the fact that there is no such thing as a real economy. Hence economic phenomena are only explicable as the outcome of the interaction of real and nominal variables.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Settling the theory of saving 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  new framework of concepts; structurecentric; axiom set; triangle theorem; income; profit; investment; productivity; time shift 
Subjects:  B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4  Economic Methodology > B41  Economic Methodology C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6  Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C65  Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools E  Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2  Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E20  General 
Item ID:  44479 
Depositing User:  Egmont KakarotHandtke 
Date Deposited:  19 Feb 2013 12:41 
Last Modified:  27 Sep 2019 01:50 
References:  Blaug, M. (1994). Why I am Not a Constructivist. Confessions of an Unrepetant Popperian. In R. E. Backhouse (Ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, pages 109–136. London, New York, NY: Routledge. Bleaney, M. (1987). OverSaving. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, pages 1–4. Palgrave Macmillan, 1st edition. URL http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde1987_X001637. Boylan, T. A., and O’Gorman, P. F. (2007). Axiomatization and Formalism in Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(2): 426–446. Bridel, P. (1987). Saving equals Investment. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, pages 1–5. Palgrave Macmillan, 1st edition. URL http://www.dictionaryofeconomics. com/article?id=pde1987_X001941. KakarotHandtke, E. (2011a). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (I). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1895268: 1–26. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1895268. KakarotHandtke, E. (2011b). TheWine Maker’s Business and the Origin of Interest in a Monetary Economy. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1939915: 1–22. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1939915. KakarotHandtke, E. (2012a). Keynes’s Employment Function and the Gratuitous Phillips Curve Desaster. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2130421: 1–19. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130421. KakarotHandtke, E. (2012b). Primary and Secondary Markets. Levy Economics InstituteWorking Papers, 741: 1–27. URL http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1654. KakarotHandtke, E. (2013). Confused Confusers: How to Stop Thinking Like an Economist and Start Thinking Like a Scientist. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2207598: 1–15. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=2207598. Kirman, A. (2010). The Economic Crisis is a Crisis for Economic Theory. CESifo Economic Studies, 56(4): 498–535. DOI 10.1093/cesifo/ifq017. Ljungqvist, L., and Sargent, T. J. (2004). Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press, 2nd edition. Quiggin, J. (2010). Zombie Economics. How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Schmiechen, M. (2009). Newton’s Principia and Related ‘Principles’ Revisited, volume 1. Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2nd edition. Schumpeter, J. A. (1946). The Decade of the Twenties. American Economic Review, 36(2): 1–10. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818192. Shaik, A. (1980). Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: Humbug II. In E. J. Nell (Ed.), Growth, Profits, and Property, pages 80–95. Cambridge, New York, NY, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Wickens, M. (2008). Macroeconomic Theory. A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/44479 